Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01059
Original file (PD2012 01059.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

N A M E:    C ASE: P D1 2 01 0 59
BR A N C H O F SE R V I C E: A R M Y         BO A R D D A T E: 2 01 3 05 3 0
SE P A R A T IO N D A T E: 20 0 306 0 3


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (11B/Infantryman) medically separated for low back pain (LBP). The CI started to experience back pain shortly after he underwent a spinal tap in 2001 to rule out possible meningitis. Despite various conservative treatment (including medication, therapy, and steroid injections) the back pain could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or physical fitness standards. He was therefore issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back condition, characterized as “lumbar spine: mechanical low back pain, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded one other condition (“intermittent rib popping”) for PEB adjudication. The PEB adjudicated “mechanical low back pain as unfitting and rated 10%. The remaining condition was determined to be not unfitting. The CI did not concur with the PEB, but did not submit an appeal and did not demand a formal hearing. The US Army Physical Disability Agency replied to the CI’s non-concurrence via memorandum indicating the PEB had adjudicated the case correctly but made an administrative change to the PEB report that made a change to the VA condition code used for the back pain. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


C I C O NT E NT IO N : T h e c ond i t i o n is g e t t i n g m u c h w o rse a n d is no w c r e a t i n g m o re i n j u r i e s. It is also k eep i n g me f r o m g e tt i n g & o r k eep i n g e m p l o y m en t w h i c h is n e e d ed t o s u p po r t my f amil y.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting low back condition is addressed below. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.

The Board acknowledges the CI’s concerns regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected condition continues to burden him but must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for future severity or potential complications of conditions for which they were medically separated. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws.

R A T I N G C O MP A R ISO N :

Service PEB Dated 20030214     VA - (2 Mos. Pre-Separation)
C ondi t i o n        C od e     R at in g   C ondi t i o n        C od e     R at in g   E x am
M e c h a n i c al Lo w B a c k P ai n …         5299-5295        10%      M e c h a n i c al Lo w B a c k P ain         5292     20 % *     20030407
I n t e rmit t en t R ib Pop pin g         N o t U n fitt i n g    R i gh t R ib N od ul e         7819     0%
N o Addi t i o n al M EB / PE B E n tri e s    N o Addi t i o n al V A E n tr i es
Combined: 10%    Combined: 20%
V A R at i n g D e ci s i o n ( VA R D ) 200 2 0715 NS C; VA R D 20050829 s er v i c e conn e c t ed .


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Mechanical Low Back Pain. The narrative summary notes the CI reported the onset of LBP following a lumbar puncture (LP) in December 2001 to rule out meningitis. He developed a post LP headache and was treated with an epidural injection of blood to seal the opening in the spinal canal covering and relieve the headache. The CI noted that his LBP was increased following this procedure despite the fact that the headache was successfully relieved and there were no complications at the time of the injection. The CI was provided a temporary 30 day profile and was not seen again until April 2002. Lumbar X-rays in April 2002 and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed in May 2002 were normal. The CI’s treatment included physical therapy and epidural steroid injections, but his LBP continued. At the MEB examination performed 2 January 2003, approximately 5 months prior to separation, the CI reported LBP. The MEB physical exam noted lumbar range-of-motion (ROM) of flexion 0-50 degrees (normal 90 degrees) but otherwise normal ROM. There was tenderness to palpation of the lumbar spine without muscle spasm. Straight leg raise (SLR) was negative bilaterally. On the DD Form 2808 from 16 December 2002 the same MEB examiner noted normal sensory, motor, and reflexes. The examiner noted that the findings were the same as the 30 December
2002 exam by the orthopedic consultant. At the VA Compensation and Pension exam performed 7 April 2003, approximately 2 months prior to separation, the CI reported constant pain in the low back without radiation or other neurological abnormalities. The VA exam noted a normal gait. Lumbar ROM was flexion 0-50 degrees, otherwise ROM was normal. There was no TTP noted. SLR was negative bilaterally with increased lumbar pain without radiation to the legs. Reflexes were normal bilaterally. There were no DeLuca criteria present on evaluation. The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.


Thoracolumbar ROM (Degrees)

Ortho/MEB exam
(20021230)
MEB ~5 Mo. Pre-Sep
(20030102)
VA C&P ~2 Mo. Pre-Sep
(20030407)
Flexion (90 Normal) 45 50 50
Extension (30) full 35 35
R Lat Flexion (30) 30 35 35
L Lat Flexion (30) 30 35 35
R Rotation (30) - 35 35
L Rotation (30) - 35 35
Combined (240)

Comment
Hands 24 in. fr flr;nl sens;reflexes; able to heel/toe walk;SLR neg Neg SLR; no spasm. Flex/ext with pain EROM; Nl gait and reflexes.
§4.71a Rating 20% 20% 20

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the LBP condition as 5299-5295 (lumbosacral strain) at 10%, citing pain limited motion without muscle spasm or radiculopathy. The VA rated the LBP condition as 5292 (limited lumbar motion) at 20% for moderate limitation of the lumbar spine. The Board is

required to provide a disability rating in accordance with VASRD rating guidelines in effect on the date of separation and the Board did so. The Board deliberated the rating of the LBP condition. The CI was noted on all exams in the ROM chart above to have lumbar ROM limited to 45 degrees to 50 degrees, with painful motion, but without muscle spasm, radiculopathy, or incapacitating episodes. The Board agreed that rating according to VARSD spine rating guidelines in effect June 2003, the CI’s LBP condition met the 10% rating coding as 5295 for characteristic pain on motion, without muscle spasm, but met the 20% rating coding as 5292 for moderate limitation of lumbar motion. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (Reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the LBP condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the LBP condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5292 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


R E C O MM E N D A T IO N : T h e B o ard r e c o mm e nd s t h at t h e C I’s p ri o r de t e rm i n a t i o n b e m o d i f i e d a s fo llo w s, e ffe c t i v e as o f th e d a t e o f h is p ri o r m e d i c al s ep ar a t i o n :

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Low Back Pain Condition 5292 20%
COMBINED 20%


Th e fo llo w i n g d o c u m e nt ary e vi d e n c e w as c on s i d e r ed :

E x h i b it A. D D F o rm 2 9 4 , d a t e d 2 01 2 06 0 3 , w / a t chs
E x h i b it B . Servi c e T r e a t m en t R e c o rd
E x h i b it C . D ep a r t m e n t o f V e te r a n s’ A ff airs T r e a t m en t R e c o rd





Ph y si c al D is a b ili t y B o a rd o f R e view



SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB),


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for AR20130014992 (PD201201059)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                 
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01871

    Original file (PD-2014-01871.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB also identified and forwarded two other conditions (bilateral sensorineural hearing loss and bilateral knee pain), both meeting retention standards for PEB adjudication. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. bilateral SLR; Repetitive motion...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01977

    Original file (PD2012 01977.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SCOPEOFREVIEW : TheBoard’sscopeofreviewisdefinedinDoDI6040.44, Enclosure3, paragraph5.e.(2). RATINGCOMPARISON : ServiceIPEB– Dated20060123 VA- (3Mos.Pre-Separation) Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Chronic LBP Secondary toDDDw/L4-5,L5-S1DiscBulge& Facet Arthropathy, w/oNeurologic Deficit, ROM Limited by Pain, Positive 5299-5242 10% SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130019923 (PD201201977)I have reviewed the enclosed...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00713

    Original file (PD2012-00713.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Listed ROM “normals” are from the VA lumbar spine exam; current VASRD normal ROMs were not in effect prior to 26 September 2003. The CI said “The pain is an 8/10. In the matter of the LBP condition, the Board, by a vote of 2:1 recommends a disability rating of 10% coded 5292 IAW VASRD §4.71a.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00783

    Original file (PD2012-00783.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY SEPARATION DATE: 20030126 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE NUMBER: PD1200783 BOARD DATE: 20130130 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SFC/E-4 (13B10/Artillery), medically separated for mechanical low back pain (LBP) secondary to back strain. The commander’s statement noted that the CI’s condition left him “incapable of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00046

    Original file (PD2013 00046.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Despitenon-operativetreatmentwith non-steroidalanti-inflammatorydrugs,periods oflimited duty(LIMDU) andlightduty, physicaltherapy(PT),andepiduralsteroidinjections (ESI),theCI’s conditioncouldnotbeadequatelyrehabilitated tocontinuetomeet thephysicalrequirements ofhisMilitary OccupationalSpecialty(MOS)orsatisfy physicalfitnessstandards. SignificantBack Pain/LumbagoandDiskDegeneration Condition . ROM limited by pain; Gait-normal; Pos.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01966

    Original file (PD2012 01966.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    MINORITY OPINION This Board member recommends a 40% rating for severe limitation of motion of the lumbar spine based on the pain limited flexion of 10 degrees at the MEB NARSUM exam and pain limited flexion of 30 degrees at the VA C&P exam. The MEB NARSUM exam documented lumbar flexion that was limited to only 10 degrees by pain, which indicates a severe limitation of motion. Although the VA C&P examination was after separation, it was actually closer in time to the date of separation, and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01158

    Original file (PD2012 01158.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On the MEB DD Form 2807 dated29 June 2001, approximately 6 months prior to separation, the CI reported recurrent back pain and numbness and tingling in his legs with running, jumping or heavy lifting.The MEB DD Form 2808 examination of the same date noted decreased “ROM with toe touch, SLR B positive, TTP lumbar region.”At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam 25 April 2002, approximately 3 months after separation, the CI reported intermittent LBP without radiation that was aggravated...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00463

    Original file (PD 2014 00463.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left knee condition was not considered by the PEB. The pain was rated at 9 out of 10. The MEB NARSUM examiner documented chronic left knee pain that was medically managed.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01058

    Original file (PD2012-01058.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    IAW DoDI 6040.44, this Board must consider the appropriate rating for the CI’s back condition at separation based on the VASRD standards in effect at that time. An outpatient examination on 21 November 2001 (7 months prior to separation) documented a negative straight leg raise (SLR) test and normal muscle strength, sensation and DTRs. At a later C&P exam on 23 June 2003 (a year after separation), the CI reported constant low back dull, aching pain.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00009

    Original file (PD2013 00009.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active dutySGT/E-5 (71L/Administrative Specialist)medically separated for chronic low back and chronic right ankle conditions.The CI initially reported low back pain (LBP) in 1992. The chronic low back and right ankle conditions, characterized as “lumbar spondylosis, chronic low back pain” and “ankle arthritis after fracture” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation...